4.4 Article

Application of non-equidistant GM(1,1) model based on the fractional-order accumulation in building settlement monitoring

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 1559-1573

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-210936

Keywords

Non-equidistant GM(1,1) model; fractional-order accumulation; grey prediction model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32160332]
  2. Inner Mongolia Agricultural University High-level Talents Scientific Research Project [NDYB2019-35]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China [2018MS 03047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the fractional-order non-equidistant GM(1,1) model (FNEGM) is established to improve the accuracy of building settlement prediction. The optimal parameters are obtained using the whale optimization algorithm, and the prediction performance of FNEGM model is evaluated against two other grey prediction models.
Non-equidistant GM(1,1) (abbreviated as NEGM) model is widely used in building settlement prediction because of its high accuracy and outstanding adaptability. To improve the building settlement prediction accuracy of the NEGM model, the fractional-order non-equidistant GM(1,1) model (abbreviated as FNEGM) is established in this study. In the modeling process of the FNEGM model, the fractional-order accumulated generating sequence is extended based on the first-order accumulated generating sequence, and the optimal parameters that increase the prediction precision of the model are obtained by using the whale optimization algorithm. The FNEGM model and the other two grey prediction models are applied to three cases, and five prediction performance indexes are used to evaluate the prediction precision of the three models. The results show that the FNEGM model is more suitable for predicting the settlement of buildings than the other two grey prediction models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available