4.4 Article

Map matching for circular road via contextual voting

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 1053-1063

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-213054

Keywords

Map matching; circular road; GPS; voting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61972439]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Colleges and Universities in Anhui Province [KJ2019A0481]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [2008085MF212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to limitations of positioning devices, GPS positioning data may have errors compared to actual locations on the map, requiring processing to improve usability. Existing map matching methods have issues with circular road sections, leading to the proposal of a contextual voting map matching method. The effectiveness of this method was verified through experiments.
Due to the limitation of positioning devices, there is a certain error between GPS positioning data and the real location on the map, and the positioning data needs to be processed to have better usability. For example, accurate location is needed for traffic flow control, automatic driving navigation, logistics tracking, etc. There are few studies specifically for circular road sections. In addition, many existing map matching methods based on Hidden Markov model (HMM) also have the problem that GPS points are easily to be matched to tangent or non-adjacent road sections at circular road sections. Therefore, the contextual voting map matching method for circular road sections (STDV-matching) is proposed. The method proposes multiple subsequent point direction analysis methods based on STD-matching to determine entry into the circular section, and adds candidate section frequency voting analysis to reduce matching errors. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified at the circular section by comparing it with three existing HMM methods through experiments using two real map and trajectory datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available