4.7 Article

Is mass-scale electrocatalysis of aqueous methanol an energetically and economically viable option for hydrogen production?

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 58-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2021.09.028

Keywords

Hydrogen evolution; Hydrogen consumption; Methanol; Electro-oxidation

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ITC (MSIT) of Korean government [2021R1A3B1068304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the potential issues of using methanol electrolysis to produce hydrogen and compares it with steam methane reforming, exploring economic and energy efficiency issues. In addition, the applicability of hydrogen evolution reaction and the use of methane are also analyzed.
The use of primary alcohols (such as methanol) in the production of hydrogen (H-2) has been spotlighted as one of the indispensable measures to pursue a greener economy. Here, we address some potential shortcomings concerning the production of H-2 based on aqueous methanol electrolysis in reference to steam methane reforming (SMR) as a mature commercial technology. After all, is SMR an economic and low-energy route for H-2 production? Is it feasible to use methanol to electrolytically generate H-2? The liquid-phase methanol-based hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at 335 K is an example of a potentially entropy driven reaction (exoergic, even though very endothermic) with a suitable catalyst using either ambient or waste heat. Further, would it be more efficient to use methane as a source of hydrogen via SMR or consume it directly as energy? The suitability of HER is assessed in the context of industrial energy analysis, thermodynamics, and sustainability. (C) 2021 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available