4.7 Article

Quantifying the impacts of anthropogenic changes and climate variability on runoff changes in central plateau of Iran using nine methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 603, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127045

Keywords

Climate variability; Anthropogenic changes; Elasticity-based methods; Sensitivity analysis; Runoff regime changes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that climate variability and anthropogenic changes have different impacts on runoff changes in two watersheds in the central plateau of Iran, with each factor accounting for a certain percentage of the overall decrease in runoff. Besides precipitation, changes in potential evapotranspiration and temperature also play a significant role in annual mean runoff in the studied watersheds. Elasticity-based methods are the fastest and most intuitive ways to investigate the impacts of anthropogenic changes and climate variability on runoff changes, although using a variety of methods is recommended.
Quantification of affecting factors on river regime changes can be greatly helpful for water resources planning and management in the basin. Both anthropogenic changes and climate variability have affected rivers' regime and led to considerable social and economic impacts. Observations in most parts of the world indicate that the hydrological cycle has been influenced by human activity besides of climate variability. In this study, 9 different methods which are divided into three general categories have been used to determine the impact of anthropogenic changes and climate variability on runoff changes in two watersheds in the central plateau of Iran, including Ghaleh-Shahrokh and Javanmardi watersheds. The results indicate that climate variability plays a dominant role in runoff decline in the Ghaleh-Shahrokh watershed, accounting for 60.2% of the total decrease, while human activities accounted for 39.8 %. In the Javanmardi watershed, anthropogenic changes played a dominant role in runoff decline, accounting for 77.1% (on average). In comparison, 22.9% (on average) of the decrease was attributable to climate variability. Sensitivity analysis of the annual mean runoff shows that precipitation plays a key role in runoff changes in both study areas. After precipitation, changes in potential evapotranspiration and temperature have the greatest impact on the annual mean runoff in the studied watersheds, respectively. Comparison of the different applied methods indicate that elasticity-based methods are the fastest and intuitive methods to investigate the impacts of anthropogenic changes and climate variability on runoff changes. Despite this, using different methods should be taken into account.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available