4.7 Article

Improving streamflow prediction in the WRF-Hydro model with LSTM networks

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 605, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127297

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2018R1A1A3A04079419, 2020R1A2C2007670]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport [21CTAP-C163541-01]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C2007670, 2018R1A1A3A04079419] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers propose a method combining WRF-Hydro and LSTM network, called WRF-Hydro-LSTM, to improve streamflow simulations. Experimental results show that WRF-Hydro-LSTM outperforms both traditional methods and using LSTM alone in streamflow prediction.
Researchers have attempted to use machine learning algorithms to replace physically based models for streamflow prediction. Although existing studies have contributed to improving machine learning methods, they still have weaknesses, such as large dataset requirements and overfitting. Therefore, we propose an approach that combines the Weather Research and Forecasting hydrological modeling system (WRF-Hydro) and the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, i.e., WRF-Hydro-LSTM, to improve streamflow simulations. In this approach, LSTM was employed to predict the residual errors of WRF-Hydro; in contrast, the conventional approach with LSTM predicts streamflow directly. Here, we performed numerical experiments to predict the inflow of Soyangho Lake in South Korea using WRF-Hydro-LSTM, WRF-Hydro-only, and LSTM-only. WRF-Hydro-LSTM and LSTM-only showed better results (NSE = 0.95 and R greater than 0.96) compared to WRF-Hydro-only (NSE = 0.72 and R = 0.88); however, in terms of the percent bias, WRF-Hydro-LSTM had a better value (1.75) than LSTM-only (17.36). While the LSTM-only follows objective functions and not physical principles, WRF-Hydro-LSTM simulates residual errors and efficiently decreases uncertainties that are inherent with conventional methods. Furthermore, a sensitivity test on the training dataset indicated that the correlation coefficient and NSE value were not overly sensitive, but the PBIAS value differed substantially depending on the training set. This study demonstrates that WRF-Hydro-LSTM is particularly useful for representing real-world physical constraints and thus can potentially improve streamflow prediction compared to using either of the two approaches exclusively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available