4.2 Article

Coupling Flood Propagation Modeling and Building Collapse in Flash Flood Studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
Volume 147, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001941

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research [2017CEYPS8]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a method that combines structural vulnerability models and hydraulic simulations in flood events, demonstrated through a specific case study. After testing its capability to simulate flow fields in complex bathymetries, this method successfully applied to reconstruct the flood event in Corna di Darfo village in Northern Italy after the collapse of the Gleno dam.
Flash flood events threaten the safety of people either because of the direct impact of the flow on people and car stability or because of structural damages to buildings. Traditionally, buildings stability is assessed with ex post analyses by vulnerability models applied to the results of hydraulic models where buildings are permanently present on the flooded domain. However, in the case of building collapse, the geometry of the computational domain should be adapted during the simulation and, accordingly, a more realistic approach would require the coupling of hydraulic modeling and structural analysis. This paper provides an example of a simple methodology implementing this procedure in HEC-RAS 2D using the results from a physically-based structural vulnerability model for masonry buildings. After positively testing the capabilities of the solver to model the flow field around isolated obstacles as well as the flow field in urban districts on complex bathymetries, the proposed procedure is applied to the reconstruction of the flood event in the Corna di Darfo village (Northern Italy) after the collapse of the Gleno dam in 1923. (c) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available