Journal
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages 1030-1041Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.01.011
Keywords
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; NASH; NAFLD; Ballooning; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Histology
Categories
Funding
- Histoindex Pte Ltd
- Newcastle NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
- Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute
- LITMUS (Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis) consortium - Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI2) Program of the European Union [777377]
- European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
- EFPIA
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study reveals poor agreement among expert hepatopathologists regarding the number of ballooned hepatocytes seen on the same digitized histology images. This has implications for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and the requirements for demonstrating 'NASH resolution' in support of drug efficacy in clinical trials. Artificial intelligence-based approaches may offer a more reliable way to assess hepatocyte ballooning.
Background & Aims: Histologically assessed hepatocyte ballooning is a key feature discriminating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from steatosis (NAFL). Reliable identification underpins patient inclusion in clinical trials and serves as a key regulatory-approved surrogate endpoint for drug efficacy. High inter/intra-observer variation in ballooning measured using the NASH CRN semi-quantitative score has been reported yet no actionable solutions have been proposed. Methods: A focused evaluation of hepatocyte ballooning recognition was conducted. Digitized slides were evaluated by 9 internationally recognized expert liver pathologists on 2 separate occasions: each pathologist independently marked every ballooned hepatocyte and later provided an overall non-NASH NAFL/NASH assessment. Interobserver variation was assessed and a `concordance atlas' of ballooned hepatocytes generated to train second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence imaging-based artificial intelligence (AI). Results: The Fleiss kappa statistic for overall interobserver agreement for presence/absence of ballooning was 0.197 (95% CI 0.094-0.300), rising to 0.362(0.258-0.465) with a >= 5-cell threshold. However, the intraclass correlation coefficient for consistency was higher (0.718 [0.511-0.900]), indicating `moderate' agreement on ballooning burden. 133 ballooned cellswere identified using a >= 5/9 majority to train AI ballooning detection (AI-pathologist pairwise concordance 19-42%, comparable to inter-pathologist pairwise concordance of between 8-75%). AI quantified change in ballooned cell burden in response to therapy in a separate slide set. Conclusions: The substantial divergence in hepatocyte ballooning identified amongst expert hepatopathologists suggests that ballooning is a spectrum, too subjective for its presence or complete absence to be unequivocally determined as a trial endpoint. A concordance atlas may be used to train AI assistive technologies to reproducibly quantify ballooned hepatocytes that standardize assessment of therapeutic efficacy. This atlas serves as a reference standard for ongoing work to refine how ballooning is classified by both pathologists and AI. Lay summary: For the first time, we show that, even amongst expert hepatopathologists, there is poor agreement regardingthe number of ballooned hepatocytes seen on the same digitized histology images. This has important implications as the presence of ballooning is needed to establish the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and its unequivocal absence is one of the key requirements to show 'NASH resolution' to support drug efficacy in clinical trials. Artificial intelligence-based approaches may provide a more reliable way to assess the range of injury recorded as hepatocyte ballooning. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available