4.5 Article

Liquefaction Resistance of Biocemented Loess Soil

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002638

Keywords

Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP); Liquefaction mitigation; Loess soil; Cyclic triaxial test; CaCO3 content

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578147]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242020R20025]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Ningxia [2020BFG02014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) has been found to significantly improve the liquefaction resistance of loess soil samples by cementing soil particles with calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and filling voids. Different treatment conditions lead to varying changes in permeability coefficient of samples, and increasing treatment cycles enhances liquefaction resistance. The addition of bacterial suspension and cementation solution together or separately also affects the liquefaction mitigation effects. Increasing total solution volume per treatment cycle improves liquefaction resistance, and the relationship between CaCO3 content and liquefaction resistance parameters can be established for MICP-solidified loess soil.
Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) is currently appraised to improve sandy soils, but only a few studies use it to solidify loess soil. MICP solidification tests and undrained cyclic triaxial tests were conducted to study the liquefaction resistance of MICP-solidified loess soil samples. The results showed that because calcium carbonate (CaCO3) cemented loess soil particles and filled voids in samples, the permeability coefficients of treated samples all decreased. However, the change pattern of the permeability coefficient of samples treated with various conditions was different. For the solidified samples, the liquefaction resistance was improved significantly, and increased treatment cycles resulted in the improvement of the liquefaction resistance. Adding bacterial suspension and the cementation solution together made the sample with initial density of 1.4 g/cm(3) have higher liquefaction resistance. However, for samples of 1.5 and 1.6 g/cm(3), adding bacterial suspension and the cementation solution separately also achieved better liquefaction mitigation effects. Increasing total solution volume per treatment cycle improved the liquefaction resistance of the solidified samples. With the increase of CaCO3 content, the number of cycles before liquefaction (N-L) and residual strength (tau(r)) exponentially increased, while the damping ratio (D) exponentially decreased. Moreover, the linear corrections between specific gravity and CaCO3 content, N-L, tau(r), and D can be established for MICP-solidified loess soil. In addition, significant corrections also existed between plasticity index and CaCO3 content, N-L, tau(r), and D. Results in this work had a great significance and provided the foundation for the application of the MICP technique for liquefaction mitigation of loess soil. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available