4.5 Article

Predictors and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors Minimally Invasive Surgery for SBNETs

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1252-1265

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05264-6

Keywords

Neuroendocrine tumors; Minimally invasive surgery; Lymph node harvest; NCDB; Outcomes; Surgical access

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the national trends in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) and its association with lymph node (LN) yield. The study found that the utilization of MIS has increased, especially in higher volume centers. MIS patients had a greater number of LN harvested and shorter length of stay compared to open surgery patients.
Background Open surgical resection with regional lymphadenectomy is the standard of care for small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs). There is no consensus on the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to evaluate the current national trends for MIS in treating SBNETs and its association with lymph node (LN) yield. Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with Stage I-III SBNETs who underwent surgery from 2010-2017. Time trends were examined using the Cochran-Armitage test. Chi-square tests, t test, and multivariable logistic regression assessed associations of surgical approach with patient, clinical, and facility characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves and propensity score weighted Cox proportional hazards model were used to examine survival. Results Of the 11,367 patients with Stage I-III SBNETs, 46.5% (N = 5,298) underwent MIS. From 2010-2017, the proportion of MIS increased from 35.6% to 57.7% (P < 0.001). Patients of Stage I disease (OR = 1.23), Caucasian race (OR = 1.18), private insurance (OR = 1.29), and higher volume centers (OR = 1.29) were more likely to undergo MIS (all P < 0.02). The average number of LN harvested in the MIS cohort was greater than in the open surgery cohort (13.3 vs 11.8 LN, P < 0.001). MIS patients had shorter length of stay by 2 days compared to open surgery (5.4 vs 7.6 days, P < 0.001). LN yield >= 8 was associated with better survival (HR = 0.77, P < 0.001). Conclusion The utilization of a MIS approach to treat Stage I-III SBNETs has increased, especially at higher volume centers. We did not observe an inferior LN harvest with the MIS cohort compared to the open surgery cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available