4.7 Review

Plant iron nutrition: the long road from soil to seeds

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages 1809-1824

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erab531

Keywords

Embryos; iron; microbiota; micronutrients; plant immunity; Pseudomonas simiae WCS417; rhizosphere; seeds; trace metal

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review examines the influence of rhizosphere microbiota on iron uptake by plants and the process of iron loading into seeds. It also discusses the potential genetic resources provided by wild relatives for crop improvement.
We review how the microbiota in the rhizosphere influence Fe uptake from soil, together with the process of loading Fe into seed, and consider how wild relatives provide a potential genetic resource for improvement of crops. Iron (Fe) is an essential plant micronutrient since many cellular processes including photosynthesis, respiration, and the scavenging of reactive oxygen species depend on adequate Fe levels; however, non-complexed Fe ions can be dangerous for cells, as they can act as pro-oxidants. Hence, plants possess a complex homeostatic control system for safely taking up Fe from the soil and transporting it to its various cellular destinations, and for its subcellular compartmentalization. At the end of the plant's life cycle, maturing seeds are loaded with the required amount of Fe needed for germination and early seedling establishment. In this review, we discuss recent findings on how the microbiota in the rhizosphere influence and interact with the strategies adopted by plants to take up iron from the soil. We also focus on the process of seed-loading with Fe, and for crop species we also consider its associated metabolism in wild relatives. These two aspects of plant Fe nutrition may provide promising avenues for a better comprehension of the long pathway of Fe from soil to seeds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available