4.7 Article

Low-cost monitoring of atmospheric PM-development and testing

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 304, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114158

Keywords

Particulate matter; Low-cost sensors; Environmental monitoring

Funding

  1. LIFE Program of the European Commission [LIFE17 IPE/HU/000 017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study on the performance of a low-cost sensor (Plantower PMS7003) showed good unit-to-unit consistency, but individual calibration was necessary. Results from a 15-month field test indicated promising quantitative and indicative performance, with an overall indicative accuracy of approximately 73-75%. It is recommended to clean the sensors after 6-8 months of operation.
Ambient particulate matter (PM) pollution is a significant problem in many urban and rural regions and has severe human health implications. Real-time, spatially dense monitoring using a network of low-cost sensors (LCS) was previously proposed as a way to alleviate the problem of PM. In this study, the performance of an LCS (Plantower PMS7003), a candidate for use in such a network, was investigated. The sensor was calibrated in a controlled climate chamber against a standard reference aerosol monitor. Reproducibility and calibration were evaluated in laboratory tests. Long-term, in-field performance was studied via deploying an LCS assembly at an environmental monitoring station. Results indicated excellent unit-to-unit consistency; however, each sensor needed to be calibrated individually as their characteristics varied slightly. Based on the results of a 15-month field test, quantitative and indicative LCS performance appeared promising: overall indicative accuracy was approximately 73-75% with comparable precision and recall. It is advised that the LCS are cleaned after 6-8 months of operation. Overall, the LCS appeared suitable for low-cost monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available