4.7 Article

Low emission zones reduced PM10 but not NO2 concentrations in Berlin and Munich, Germany

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 302, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114048

Keywords

Low emission zone; Air quality; PM10; NO2; Vehicular emission; Generalized additive model

Funding

  1. ERA-ENVHEALTH network [219337]
  2. ANSES (France)
  3. ADEME (France)
  4. BELSPO (Belgium)
  5. UBA (Germany)
  6. Swedish EPA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The implementation of low emission zones (LEZs) has been shown to be an effective method to improve urban air quality, particularly in reducing PM mass concentration and EC level. The combination of LEZ with heavy-duty vehicle transit bans in cities like Berlin and Munich significantly lowered PM10 concentrations, with the greatest effects observed in LEZ stage 3. In contrast, the effects of LEZ on NO2 levels were inconsistent across different cities and stages of implementation.
Low emission zones (LEZs) aiming at improving the air quality in urban areas have been implemented in many European cities. However, studies are limited in evaluating the effects of LEZ, and most of which used simple methods. In this study, a general additive mixed model was utilized to account for confounders in the atmosphere and validate the effects of LEZ on PM10 and NO2 concentrations in two German cities. In addition, the effects of LEZ on elemental carbon (EC) and total carbon (TC) in Berlin were also evaluated. The LEZ effects were estimated after taking into account air pollutant concentrations at a reference site located in the regional background, and adjusting for hour of the week, public holidays, season, and wind direction. The LEZ in Berlin, and the LEZ in combination with the heavy-duty vehicle (HDV) transit ban in Munich significantly reduced the PM10 concentrations, at both traffic sites (TS) and urban background sites (UB). The effects were greater in LEZ stage 3 than in LEZ stages 2 and 1. Moreover, compared with PM10, LEZ was more efficient in reducing EC, a component that is considered more toxic than PM10 mass. In contrast, the LEZ had no consistent effect on NO2 levels: no effects were observed in Berlin; in Munich, the combination of the LEZ and the HDV transit ban reduced NO2 at UB site in LEZ stage 1, but without further reductions in subsequent stages of the LEZ. Overall, our study indicated that LEZs, which target the major primary air pollution source in the highly populated city center could be an effective way to improve urban air quality such as PM mass concentration and EC level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available