4.2 Article

Effect of Carbon Source on Biological Nutrient Removal in an Anaerobic, Hypoxic, Anoxic, or Aerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Volume 147, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001944

Keywords

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND); Denitrifying phosphorus removal (DPR); Sequencing batch reactor (SBR); Carbon source; Enzyme activity

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Social Development Project [BE2018630]
  2. Wuxi Technology Development Fund [WX18IVJN609]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Xizang [XZ202001ZY0052G]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study on different carbon sources in a sequencing batch reactor revealed that propionate enhances phosphorus removal while acetate has a higher efficiency in nitrogen removal. Acetate shows better performance in total nitrogen and total phosphorus removal, making it a more suitable choice for the SND-DPR coupled system.
A sequencing batch reactor was constructed to realize simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) and denitrifying phosphorus removal (DPR). The influence of different carbon sources (acetate, acetate and propionate, and propionate) was explored. The total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiency reached the highest value of 66.4% with acetate. The total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiency was nearly the same (97.9%-96.1%) with different carbon sources. Propionate facilitates TP removal during the hypoxic stage to weaken glycogen metabolism in phosphorus-accumulating organisms (PAOs) and promote dehydrogenase and phosphorus removal-related enzyme activities. Propionate also facilitates the competitiveness of PAOs against glycogen-accumulating organisms (GAOs). TN removal during the SND process in the hypoxic stage was maintained at 38.2%-40.2%, which is explained by the relative amount of change in nitrifying and denitrifying microorganisms. However, acetate promoted TN (from 9.2% to 17.3%) and TP (from 18.1% to 22.7%) removal during the DPR stage, thus enhancing final TN removal and maintaining TP removal. Consequently, acetate may be a better choice for a SND-DPR-coupled system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available