4.1 Article

On Reducing Test Data Volume for Circular Scan Architecture Using Modified Shuffled Shepherd Optimization

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10836-021-05975-9

Keywords

Shuffled Shepherd Optimization (SSO); Conflicting bits minimization (CBM); Travelling Salesman Problem; Hamming distance; Compression Ratio; TAT; TDV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel test data compression system is proposed for reducing test data volume in circular scan architecture, optimizing conflicting bit minimization problem. Experimental outcomes show that the proposed method achieves improved compression ratio and test application time efficiency, along with reduction in test data volume.
In this manuscript, a novel test data compression (TDC) system is proposes for reducing a test data volume (TDV) for circular scan (CS) architecture. A modified version of meta-heuristic population based optimization approach, hence it is called shuffled shepherd optimization (SSO) and it is used to optimize the conflicting bit minimization (CBM) problem. In CS framework, TDC is reached by upgrading only the conflicting bits among template pattern, real test pattern. Reduced test data volume and test application time are achieved by diminishing the Hamming distance between the currently captured response and the subsequent test vector. The CBM issue is formulated by a traveling salesman problem (TSP). Here, the test vectors are assumed by cities, the HD among test vectors a pair is assumed by distance of interurban. A modified version of the SSO algorithm called as MSSO is applied in combination using mutation operator for solving the issue of CBM. Experimental outcomes display the proposed TDC method using MSSO achieves an average development of 8.36% in compression ratio (CR) as well as 6.77% in TAT is attained by reducing a TDV. This proposed approach outperforms other state-of-art test data compression schemes by providing improved CR, TAT reduction and TDV reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available