4.5 Article

Transient Liquid-Phase Sintering Bonding Based on Cu40Sn60 (wt.%) Core/Shell Particles for High-Temperature Power Device Packaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Volume 50, Issue 12, Pages 7283-7292

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-021-09257-0

Keywords

Transient liquid-phase sintering; high-temperature; power devices; Cu@Sn core; shell powder

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51474026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high-tin-content Cu@Sn core/shell powder was successfully used for transient liquid-phase sintering bonding of high-temperature power device packaging. The resultant bonding layer could withstand temperatures up to 400 degrees C, and the shear strength of the joint was enhanced with the increase of bonding time and bonding temperature, reaching a highest value of 43.2 MPa. Additionally, a denser joint was achieved using the Cu@Sn core/shell powders compared to mixed powders.
In this study, a high-tin-content Cu@Sn core/shell (40 wt.% Cu-60 wt.% Sn) powder was fabricated for transient liquid-phase sintering bonding of high-temperature power device packaging. Benefitting from the high tin content Cu@Sn core/shell powder, a sound joint was obtained at 260 degrees C, 300 degrees C, and 340 degrees C with a bonding pressure of 0.2 MPa. The effect of parameters on microstructure and shear strength of the bonding layer was researched. The results demonstrated that the bonding layer consisted of Cu6Sn5, Cu3Sn, and residual Cu particles when Sn was consumed. The differential scanning calorimetry curves showed that the resultant bonding layer could sustain high temperatures up to 400 degrees C. The shear strength of the joint was enhanced with the increase of bonding time and bonding temperature, and the highest value was 43.2 MPa. Besides, compared to the joint achieved with mixed powders, a denser joint was achieved using the Cu@Sn core/shell powders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available