Journal
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages 3248-3268Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21344
Keywords
animal welfare; cow-calf separation; citizen values; dairy production; animal care
Funding
- Hans Sigrist Research Prize (Bern, Switzerland)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Early cow-calf separation followed by individual housing of calves is a common practice in the dairy industry. However, there is growing evidence that the public opposes these practices. A survey conducted in Canada and the United States found that attitudes and perceptions of animal welfare were more positive towards systems where calves were not separated from the cow. This suggests that there may be low acceptance of any cow-calf management system involving early separation as such systems do not align with underlying values.
Early cow-calf separation followed by individual housing of calves is standard practice on dairy farms. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that as awareness grows the public will oppose these practices, which could compromise the dairy industry's social li-cense. Despite disagreement among different stakeholders over weighting and evaluations of effects of early separation (e.g., distress response, disease risk), recent systematic reviews indicate that there is little scientific evidence supporting this practice. The acceptability of alternative cow-calf management systems is unknown. We used a mixed methods survey with a convenience sample of 307 Canadians plus a representative sample of 1,487 Americans to investigate perceptions of these systems, examining the effects of providing social or foster cow contact following early separation or not separating cow-calf pairs. Attitudes and perceptions of animal welfare were more positive (on a 7-point scale where 1 is most negative, 7 is most positive, and 4 is a neutral midpoint) toward the system where calves were not separated from the cow (mean +/- SE; 5.8 +/- 0.07; 5.7 +/- 0.07), compared with systems in which the calf was separated and individually housed (3.6 +/- 0.07; 3.4 +/- 0.07), separated and group housed (3.7 +/- 0.07; 3.4 +/- 0.07), or separated and kept with a foster cow (3.8 +/- 0.07; 3.6 +/- 0.07). Participants were consistent in their attitudes toward and perceptions of animal welfare within the system, suggesting that participants took a holistic and value-oriented approach to cow-calf management regarding separation. These results, in combination with many participants' concern for the importance of the mother cow-calf relationship and perceptions that severing of this bond was a breach of standard of care, suggest that there may be low ac-ceptance of any cow-calf management system involving early separation as such systems are unlikely to reso-nate with underlying values.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available