4.6 Article

Finding sound shells in LISA mock data using likelihood sampling

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/11/002

Keywords

cosmological phase transitions; gravitational wave detectors; gravitational waves/experiments; particle physics-cosmology connection

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2121, 390833306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the potential of LISA to detect features of gravitational wave spectra from cosmological first-order phase transitions, focusing on double-broken power law spectra. Analysis using mock data indicates challenges in observing two break frequencies from the electroweak phase transition due to frequency shift caused by strong phase transitions. The research reveals differences between signals from the sound shell model and simulations.
We study to what extent LISA can observe features of gravitational wave spectra originating from cosmological first-order phase transitions. We focus on spectra which are of the form of double-broken power laws. These spectra are predicted by hydrodynamic simulations and also analytical models such as the sound shell model. We argue that the ratio of the two break frequencies is an interesting observable since it can be related to the wall velocity while overall amplitude and frequency range are often degenerate for the numerous characteristics of the phase transition. Our analysis uses mock data obtained from the power spectra predicted by the simplified simulations and the sound shell model and analyzes the detection prospects using chi(2)-minimization and likelihood sampling. We point out that the prospects of observing two break frequencies from the electroweak phase transition is hindered by a shift of the spectrum to smaller frequencies for strong phase transitions. Finally, we also highlight some differences between signals from the sound shell model compared to simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available