4.7 Article

Traction open boundary condition for incompressible, turbulent, single- or multi-phase flows, and surface wave simulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 443, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110528

Keywords

Outflow; Non-reflective boundary; Backflow instability

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research (ONR) as part of the Multidisciplinary University Research Initiatives (MURI) Program [N000141612617]
  2. IDEX UGA International Strategic Partnerships program
  3. GENCI-CINES [A0072A00611]
  4. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000141612617] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel traction open boundary condition to address issues encountered in simulations, demonstrating its accuracy and stability in various flow scenarios.
In simulations, artificial boundaries need to be introduced to limit the size of computational domains and thereby lower computational cost. At these boundaries, flow variables need to be calculated in a way that will not induce any perturbation of the interior solution, which poses a great challenge in incompressible flows. In this paper, we demonstrate the potential of a new traction open boundary condition to address the classical problems encountered in simulations with open boundary conditions: backflow instability, wave reflections, and confinement caused by the proximity of the outlet. This novel boundary treatment, based on a Lagrangian estimation of the traction in the outlet section coupled to a stabilization term, is shown to provide accuracy and stability for turbulent, single- or multi-phase flows, test cases. Using a simulation of surface gravity waves, we show that if special care is given to the computation of the estimated traction, it is possible to get a fully non-reflective open boundary condition. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available