4.7 Article

The exact Riemann solver for the shallow water equations with a discontinuous bottom

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 450, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110801

Keywords

Riemann problem; Exact Riemann solver; Shallow water equations; Discontinuous bottom geometry

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [17-77-30006]
  2. State task for Water Problems Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences [0147-2019-0003, AAAA-A18-118022090105-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new exact Riemann solver for the shallow water equations with a discontinuous bottom, and demonstrates its advantages in numerical solution by embedding it into the Godunov scheme. The results show significant improvements in computational efficiency and prediction accuracy, especially in handling non-stationary flow problems.
A new exact Riemann solver for the shallow water equations with a discontinuous bottom is proposed. The algorithm is based on the approach to overcome the non-uniqueness of the Riemann problem solution by assuming that the 'true' solution should have the discharge at the bottom discontinuity, which continuously depends on the initial conditions. The solver ensures the existence and uniqueness of a solution for arbitrary initial conditions. The exact Riemann solver is embedded in the Godunov scheme for numerical solution of the shallow water equations to demonstrate its advantage. It is shown that the proposed solver allows one to significantly reduce the number of computational cells for stationary flows and non-stationary ones if the mesh can resolve non-stationary features of the flow. In addition, the practical problem of rainfall-runoff is considered, and the results obtained using the exact Riemann solver show good agreement with observation data. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available