4.5 Article

Visualizing Class Specific Heterogeneous Tendencies in Categorical Data

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 790-801

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2035737

Keywords

Clustering; Contingency table; External information; Multiple correspondence analysis; Visualization

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [20K19755]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K19755] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In multiple correspondence analysis, a biplot can be used to depict the relationships between categories and individuals. Additional information about individuals can enhance interpretation capacities, such as including class information to facilitate the interpretation of relationships between individuals and categories.
In multiple correspondence analysis, both individuals (observations) and categories can be represented in a biplot that jointly depicts the relationships across categories and individuals, as well as the associations between them. Additional information about the individuals can enhance interpretation capacities, such as by including class information for which the interdependencies are not of immediate concern, but that facilitate the interpretation of the plot with respect to relationships between individuals and categories. This article proposes a new method which we call multiple-class cluster correspondence analysis that identifies dusters specific to classes. The proposed method can construct a biplot that depicts heterogeneous tendencies of individual members, as well as their relationships with the original categorical variables. A simulation study to investigate the performance of the proposed method and an application to data regarding road accidents in the United Kingdom confirms the viability of this approach. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available