4.7 Article

Nanonewton scale adhesion force measurements on biotinylated microbeads with a robotic micropipette

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 602, Issue -, Pages 291-299

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.180

Keywords

Adhesion force; Binding force; Microbead; Micropipette; Computational fluid dynamics

Funding

  1. National Research, Development and Innovation Office [PD 124559, PD 131543, KH_17, KKP_19]
  2. Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigated the physical background of biomolecular adhesion force through experiments and simulations, taking into account the impact of targeting offset on the results. The findings revealed that a higher targeting offset led to an increase in lifting force, while increasing flow rate actually decreased the lifting force. After reaching the maximum lifting force, further increasing the flow rate did not enhance the micropipette's manipulation force on the microbeads.
Binding force between biomolecules has a crucial role in most biological processes. Receptor-ligand interactions transmit physical forces and signals simultaneously. Previously, we employed a robotic micropipette both in live cell and microbead adhesion studies to explore the adhesion force of biomolecules such as cell surface receptors including specific integrins on immune cells. Here we apply standard computational fluid dynamics simulations to reveal the detailed physical background of the flow generated by the micropipette when probing microbead adhesion on functionalized surfaces. Measuring the aspiration pressure needed to pick up the biotinylated 10 um beads on avidin coated surfaces and converting it to a hydrodynamic lifting force on the basis of simulations, we found an unbinding force of 12 +/- 2 nN, when targeting the beads manually; robotic targeting resulted in 9 +/- 4 nN (mean +/- SD). We measured and simulated the effect of the targeting offset, when the microbead was out of the axis (off-axis)of the micropipette. According to the simulations, the higher offset resulted in a higher lifting force acting on the bead. Considering this effect, we could readily correct the impact of the targeting offset to renormalize the experimental data. Horizontal force and torque also appeared in simulations in case of a targeting offset. Surprisingly, simulations show that the lifting force acting on the bead reaches a maximum at a flow rate of similar to 5 mu l/s if the targeting offset is not very high (<5 mu m). Further increasing the flow rate decreases the lifting force. We attribute this effect to the spherical geometry of the bead. We predict that higher flow rates cannot increase the hydrodynamic lifting force acting on the precisely targeted microbead, setting a fundamental force limit (16 nN in our setup) for manipulating microbeads with a micropipette perpendicular to the supporting surface. In order to extend the force range, we propose the offset targeting of microbeads. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available