4.7 Article

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 150-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.00608

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0505803]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81625017, 82072610]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX10302205]
  4. Research and Development Planned Project in Key Areas of Guangdong Province [2019B110233002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the overall survival of patients with unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma treated with FOLFOX-HAIC or TACE as first-line therapy. The results showed that FOLFOX-HAIC significantly improved overall survival compared to TACE, with higher treatment response rate and longer progression-free survival.
PURPOSE - In a previous phase II trial, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) yielded higher treatment responses than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare the overall survival of patients treated with FOLFOX-HAIC versus TACE as first-line treatment in this population. METHODS In this randomized, multicenter, open-label trial, adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (largest diameter >= 7 cm) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread were randomly assigned 1:1 to FOLFOX-HAIC (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2), leucovorin 400 mg/m(2), fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m(2 )on day 1, and fluorouracil infusion 2,400 mg/m(2) for 24 hours, once every 3 weeks) or TACE (epirubicin 50 mg, lobaplatin 50 mg, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles). The primary end point was overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in patients who received >= 1 cycle of study treatment. RESULTS Between October 1, 2016, and November 23, 2018, 315 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX-HAIC (n = 159) or TACE (n = 156). The median overall survival in the FOLFOX-HAIC group was 23.1 months (95% CI, 18.5 to 27.7) versus 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 17.9) in the TACE group (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.75; P < .001). The FOLFOX-HAIC group showed a higher response rate than the TACE group (73 [46%] v 28 [18%]; P < .001) and a longer median progression-free survival (9.6 [95% CI, 7.4 to 11.9] v 5.4 months [95% CI, 3.8 to 7.0], P < .001). The incidence of serious adverse events was higher in the TACE group than in the FOLFOX-HAIC group (30% v 19%, P = .03). Two deaths in the FOLFOX-HAIC group and two in the TACE group were deemed to be treatment-related. CONCLUSION FOLFOX-HAIC significantly improved overall survival over TACE in patients with unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma. (C) 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available