4.6 Article

Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for cardiac catheterisation: A Delphi study and an analytic hierarchy process

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Volume 31, Issue 19-20, Pages 2821-2838

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16105

Keywords

analytic hierarchy process; cardiac catheterisation; indicators; nursing; quality

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai Municipal Health Commission [201840113]
  2. Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University [2018ZSFZ021]
  3. Fudan University [FNF201935]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to develop a set of nursing-sensitive quality indicators (NSQIs) for evaluating nursing quality in cardiac catheterisation. Through literature retrieval, expert discussions, and Delphi surveys, primary and secondary indicators were identified and consensus was reached. The findings revealed the establishment of NSQIs for cardiac catheterisation, with the need for further validation in clinical practice to assess their impact on nursing quality evaluation and continuous improvement.
Background: Nursing care can profoundly reduce the risk of emergencies related to cardiac catheterisation. Therefore, identifying nursing-sensitive quality indicators (NSQIs) to evaluate nursing quality is critical for optimal cardiac catheterisation. However, studies on NSQIs for cardiac catheterisation are scarce. Objectives: This study was conducted to develop a set of NSQIs for cardiac catheterisation. Methods: Literature retrieval and expert group discussions were conducted to identify potential NSQIs and compile an inquiry questionnaire. Then, Delphi surveys were used to collect opinions from experts in the field of cardiac catheterisation. The consistency of the consultation results formed the basis on which we conducted the next rounds of consultation. Based on the importance given to each NSQI by the consulted experts in the previous round, we determined the weight coefficient of each indicator with the analytic hierarchy process. This study was performed according to the SRQR guidelines. Results: We conducted two rounds of expert inquiry. The recovery rates of the first and second questionnaires were 100% and 66.67%, respectively. The average authoritative coefficients were 0.86 and 0.91. The Kendall W values ranged from 0.214 similar to 0.361 (p < .001). Consensus was reached on 3 primary indicators, 8 secondary indicators and 20 tertiary indicators. Conclusions: A set of NSQIs for cardiac catheterisation was developed. However, the effects of these NSQIs on the evaluation and continuous improvement of nursing quality in cardiac catheterisation need to be verified in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available