4.3 Article

Cohort study of THRIVE predicting adverse outcomes in acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation and posterior circulation after 3 months and 1 year of follow-up

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 33-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.004

Keywords

THRIVE; Anterior circulation; Posterior circulation; Acute ischemic stroke; Prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the difference in predicting adverse outcomes between anterior circulation and posterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using the Totaled Health Risks In Vascular Events (THRIVE) scale. The results showed that THRIVE had a similar predictive effect for short-term and long-term adverse prognosis in both types of AIS.
Purpose: To evaluate the difference of Totaled Health Risks In Vascular Events (THRIVE) in predicting adverse outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) of the anterior circulation and posterior circulation at 3-month and 1-year follow-up. Methods: A total of 858 patients with AIS were followed up for 3 months and 1 year, and their data prospectively collected. The occurrence of death or moderate to severe disability (modified Rankin Scale > 3 points) was regarded as the endpoint. MedCalc software was used to create the THRIVE receiver operating characteristic curve. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to compare the THRIVE scale in predicting adverse outcomes in AIS of the anterior and posterior circulation and compare the differences. Results: At 3-month follow-up, the AUC of THRIVE was 0.685 (95% CI 0.644- 0.724) for AIS of the anterior circulation and 0.709 (95% CI 0.647-0.765) for AIS of the posterior circulation. The area difference between them was 0.0235 (95% CI-0.0728-0.120, P = 0.6330[>0.05]). The AUC of THRIVE for AIS in the anterior circulation at 1 year was 0.701 (95% CI 0.660-0.740), and that for AIS in the posterior circulation at 1 year was 0.747 (95% CI 0.687-0.800). The area difference between them was 0.0458 (95% CI-0.0489-0.140, P = 0.3436 [>0.05]). The difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: THRIVE can well predict the short-term and long-term adverse prognosis of AIS in the anterior and posterior circulation and has the same predictive effect. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available