4.7 Article

Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Viral-Load Curves in Paired Saliva Samples and Nasal Swabs Inform Appropriate Respiratory Sampling Site and Analytical Test Sensitivity Required for Earliest Viral Detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01785-21

Keywords

RT-qPCR; COVID-19; case-ascertained; diagnostics; household study; longitudinal sampling; nasal swab; presymptomatic; saliva; surveillance; transmission

Categories

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-023124]
  2. Ronald and Maxine Linde Center for New Initiatives at the California Institute of Technology
  3. Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine at the California Institute of Technology
  4. National Institutes of Health NIGMS predoctoral training grant [GM008042]
  5. UCLA DGSOM Geffen fellowship
  6. Caltech graduate student fellowship
  7. National Institutes of Health Biotechnology Leadership Predoctoral Training Program (BLP) fellowship from Caltech's Donna and Benjamin M. Rosen Bioengineering Center [T32GM112592]
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-023124] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early detection is crucial in controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This study found that high-analytical-sensitivity saliva testing could detect infection several days earlier than low-analytical-sensitivity nasal-swab testing. Although nasal swabs had higher peak viral loads, they were undetectable or at lower loads during the initial days of infection. These findings emphasize the importance of acquiring early viral-load profiles to guide testing strategies and response to emerging variants.
Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is critical to reduce asymptomatic and presymptomatic transmission, curb the spread of variants, and maximize treatment efficacy. Low-analytical-sensitivity nasal-swab testing is commonly used for surveillance and symptomatic testing, but the ability of these tests to detect the earliest stages of infection has not been established. In this study, conducted between September 2020 and June 2021 in the greater Los Angeles County, California, area, initially SARS-CoV-2-negative household contacts of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 prospectively self-collected paired anterior-nares nasal-swab and saliva samples twice daily for viral-load quantification by high-sensitivity reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and digital-RT-PCR assays. We captured viral-load profiles from the incidence of infection for seven individuals and compared diagnostic sensitivities between respiratory sites. Among unvaccinated persons, testing saliva with a high-analytical-sensitivity assay detected infection up to 4.5 days before viral loads in nasal swabs reached concentrations detectable by low-analytical-sensitivity nasal-swab tests. For most participants, nasal swabs reached higher peak viral loads than saliva but were undetectable or at lower loads during the first few days of infection. High-analytical-sensitivity saliva testing was most reliable for earliest detection. Our study illustrates the value of acquiring early (within hours after a negative high-sensitivity test) viral-load profiles to guide the appropriate analytical sensitivity and respiratory site for detecting earliest infections. Such data are challenging to acquire but critical to designing optimal testing strategies with emerging variants in the current pandemic and to respond to future viral pandemics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available