4.5 Article

High prevalence of thyroid hormone autoantibody and low rate of thyroid hormone detection interference

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24124

Keywords

autoimmune thyroid disease; interference; nonthyroid autoimmune diseases; thyroid hormone autoantibody

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670721]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of THAb in AITD patients was lower than that in NTAID patients in China. Only 9.18% of patients with positive THAb had falsely elevated TH levels among all subjects.
Objective Thyroid hormone autoantibody (THAb) is a common antibody in autoimmune disease and can interfere with the detection of thyroid hormone (TH). There was no research reporting the prevalence of THAb in Chinese and the rate of THAb interfering with TH detection. Methods We collected 114 patients with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) (Hashimoto's thyroiditis, 57 cases; Graves' disease, 57 cases), 106 patients with nonthyroid autoimmune diseases (NTAID), and 120 healthy subjects. According to the presence or absence of thyroid antibodies, patients with NTAID were divided into two groups: NTAID-AITD and NTAID groups. Radioimmunoprecipitation technique was used to detect THAb in all subjects. TH was detected on Abbot and Roche platforms in patients with positive THAb. Results The prevalence of THAb was 22.8% in Hashimoto's thyroiditis and 45.6% in Graves' disease. The prevalence of THAb in AITD group was lower than that in NTAID or NTAID-AITD groups (34.2% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.014; 34.2% vs. 71.3%, p < 0.01). Among total 98 patients with positive THAb, TH levels of 9 patients were falsely elevated (9.18%). Conclusion The prevalence of THAb in AITD patients was lower than that in NTAID patients. Although THAb had a high frequency in various autoimmune diseases, the prevalence of THAb interfering with TH detection was only 9.18%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available