Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 219-226Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018
Keywords
Research quality; Methodology; Reporting
Funding
- Internal Funds KU Leuven [C24M/20/064]
- NIHR Biomed-ical Research Centre, Oxford
- Cancer Research UK [C49297/A27294]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Medical research quality remains poor due to the longstanding undervaluation of methodology in science. Despite various improvement initiatives, the overall system is disjointed and slow to adapt, requiring top-down actions from journals, universities, funders, and governments to break the cycle.
Covid-19 research made it painfully clear that the scandal of poor medical research, as denounced by Altman in 1994, persists today. The overall quality of medical research remains poor, despite longstanding criticisms. The problems are well known, but the research community fails to properly address them. We suggest that most problems stem from an underlying paradox: although methodology is undeniably the backbone of high-quality and responsible research, science consistently undervalues methodology. The focus remains more on the destination (research claims and metrics) than on the journey. Notwithstanding, research should serve society more than the reputation of those involved. While we notice that many initiatives are being established to improve components of the research cycle, these initiatives are too disjointed. The overall system is monolithic and slow to adapt. We assert that top-down action is needed from journals, universities, funders and governments to break the cycle and put methodology first. These actions should involve the widespread adoption of registered reports, balanced research funding between innovative, incremental and methodological research projects, full recognition and demystification of peer review, improved methodological review of reports, adherence to reporting guidelines, and investment in methodological education and research. Currently, the scientific enterprise is doing a major disservice to patients and society. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available