☆ 4.6 Review

Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis

Anneliese Arno et al.

Summary: The study analyzed the attitudes of guideline developers towards the use of automation in health evidence synthesis and found that compatibility with current values and practices was the primary concern, followed by relative advantage and observability. Participants expressed a desire for transparency in automation software methodology. Complexity and trialability were of less interest. The conclusions emphasized the importance of ensuring new technologies align with current values and maximizing transparency to address the concerns of guideline developers for wider use of machine learning and automation technologies in systematic reviews and guideline development.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation

Hannah Harrison et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study

Justin Clark et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Mathematical & Computational Biology

Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews

A. J. van Altena et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2019)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis

Iain J. Marshall et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Economics

Variation in Health Technology Assessment and Reimbursement Processes in Europe

Ronald L. Akehurst et al.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry

Rohit Borah et al.

BMJ OPEN (2017)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

The automation of systematic reviews

Guy Tsafnat et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.