4.7 Review

Sustainability in engineering education: A review of learning outcomes

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 330, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129734

Keywords

Education for sustainable development; Engineering education; Sustainable development; Realist review; Scoping review; Learning outcomes

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article addresses the knowledge gaps in engineering education regarding sustainability and explores the differences between expected and actual learning outcomes. The study finds that engineering education providers desire an integrative approach to sustainability, but it requires more administrative resources. Furthermore, engineering education struggles to foster intercultural learning characteristics expected in integrated sustainability education. The article also offers implications and priorities for future research on engineering education for sustainability.
Although UNESCO and the UN's Sustainable Development Goals have articulated the critical role of engineering in achieving sustainable forms of development, there remains the need to analyze the design, features, and nature of sustainability-focused initiatives in engineering education. To date, few studies have identified the main knowledge gaps in this sector of higher education. At the same time, there is no known research exploring student and graduate learning outcomes in particular contextual settings. To address these gaps, this article uses a realist scoping review to map and analyze how engineering education has approached sustainability in higher education institutions since the 1990s. Our study explores the approaches of curricula, teaching, and learning renewals promoted in higher education engineering programs identifying critical differences between the expected and actual learning outcomes. Key findings drawn from a range of international contexts include broad evidence that engineering education providers desire to approach sustainability from an integrative perspective. However, this approach typically demands more administrative resources to develop formal and hidden curriculum mechanisms. As a result, engineering education struggles to foster the associated intra- and inter-cultural learning characteristics expected within integrated sustainability education. Findings also suggest re-evaluating the connotation and senses of 'being and becoming an engineer', including social responsibilities in engineering education, to empower students as active agents of change. Implications for practice, policy, and curriculum development of nine approaches to engineering education for sustainability are also offered, alongside possibilities and priorities for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available