4.7 Article

Carbon_in_WaterDSS: A new tool to determine GHG emissions in quasi-real time for irrigation systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129640

Keywords

Carbon footprint; Modelling; GHG emissions; Energy use; Irrigation; Groundwater

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (MEC) [AGL 2017-82927-C3-2-R]
  2. Consejerka de Educacion y Ciencia de Castilla-La Mancha [SBPLY-19-18501-000080, SBPLY/17/180501/000251]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  4. FEDER funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the carbon footprint of irrigated agricultural activities and finds that the energy transformation rate varies significantly during the irrigation season, with farmers not always choosing the energy periods that result in the lowest carbon footprint value.
Climate change is a reality, and irrigated agriculture is a significant human activity that contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and, therefore, to global warming. Traditionally, the carbon footprint associated with GHG emissions has been computed by fixed electrical energy transformation rates (kgCO(2)e kWh(-1)). However, this transformation rate is not constant because it depends on a country's power generation mix, which combines of the energy sources supplying a country (coal, nuclear, wind, photovoltaic, hydraulic, natural gas, etc.). Fixed transformation rates have been traditionally employed to estimate the carbon footprint that derives from irrigated agricultural activity. Nevertheless, these fixed rates can be inaccurate for not considering variations over time. Thus, in this work, a new decision support system called Carbon_in_WaterDSS was developed in Python and applied to a real-world scenario to determine a dynamic and realistic energy transformation rate and to compute an accurate carbon footprint. Different time periods were considered according to irrigation stakeholders' water management criteria, crop water requirements, energy costs and pricing electricity tariff periods. The results show that the energy transformation rate and, therefore, the carbon footprint value vastly vary during the irrigation season and over for a day (from 0.066 kgCO(2)e kWh(-1) to 0.490 kgCO(2)e kWh(-1)), unlike the values found in other works. This work also highlights how farmers choose the most economical energy periods to use conventional electricity. However, this hourly choice criterion is not the option that generates the lowest carbon footprint value in most analysed years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available