4.7 Article

Co-occurrence of microplastics and hydrochar stimulated the methane emission but suppressed nitrous oxide emission from a rice paddy soil

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 337, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130504

Keywords

Handling Editor; Bin Chen; Hydrochar; Microplastic; Greenhouse gas (GHG); Microbial functional gene; Rice paddy

Funding

  1. Program for Guangdong Intro-ducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams, China [2019ZT08L213]
  2. Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) , China [GML2019ZD0403]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [41877090, 42007013]
  4. Agricultural Science and Tech-nology Independent Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province, China [CX (20) 3178]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of the co-occurrence of Hydrochar (HBC) and microplastics (MPs) on greenhouse gas emissions and microbial communities. It was found that HBC alone had limited impact on methane emissions but increased nitrous oxide emissions. The addition of MPs significantly increased methane emissions and had some mitigation effect on nitrous oxide emissions.
Hydrochar (HBC) is an emerging carbon-enriched material produced from renewable resources using hydrothermal carbonization and has performed multiple functions as a soil amendment, including greenhouse gas (GHGs) emission mitigation in croplands. With more and more microplastics (MPs) entering soil, there are concerns about the impacts of the co-occurrence of HBC and MPs on GHGs emissions and the associated microbial communities, which have not been revealed. This study conducted a rice paddy soil column experiment. The co-effects of 0.5 wt% MPs (polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PAN)) and 1.0 wt% HBC on nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions were investigated relative to treatment of HBC alone and control check (CK). Also, the microbial mechanism regulating N2O and CH4 emissions has been clarified. Results showed that compared with CK, the addition of HBC alone reduced CH4 cumulative emission by 27.7% although the change was insignificant, but increased N2O cumulative emission by 66.3%. Overall, HBC alone showed limited impacts on global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI). This effect was distinctly altered by PE and PAN addition. The co-occurrence of HBC and PE caused obviously higher methanogens gene (mcrA) in soil but lower rice grain yield, leading to the increase of CH4 emissions by 83.5% and GHGIN2O + CH4 by 36.0% compared to HBC alone. While, no apparent difference in CH4 emission occurred between HBC + PAN and HBC. By contrast, HBC + PAN obviously increased N2O reductase gene (nosZ) abundance and decreased the ratio of denitrification gene nirS and nirK to nosZ. Thus, HBC + PAN showed 3- and 4-fold lower N2O emissions than CK and HBC, respectively. Among all the treatments, HBC + PAN exhibited the strongest GWPN2O + CH4 and GHGIN2O + CH4 mitigation effect. This study firstly demonstrates that the potential of HBC in mitigating GHGs emission in the rice field would greatly and differently vary with the co-occurrence of different types of MPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available