4.7 Article

Green office buildings and sustainability: Does green human resource management elicit green behaviors?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129764

Keywords

Green HRM; Green behaviors; Sustainability; Organizational identification; Job satisfaction and work-related flow

Funding

  1. CRC for Low Carbon Living: Closing the Loop project [RP1009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper looks at the impact of Green HRM and green behaviors on employee outcomes in green office buildings, and collected data from 549 employees and 91 managers in 17 organizations in Australia. The research confirms the double mediation effects of Green HRM, green behaviors, and organizational identification on the relationships between organizational readiness, job satisfaction, and work-related flow.
Green buildings are synonymous with environmental sustainability; however, it is unclear what role its occupants, specifically employees, play in promoting sustainability in green office buildings. This paper proposes that Green Human Resource Management (HRM), underpinned by Social Identity Theory (SIT), can maximize the potential of green behaviors to improve employees' outcomes (e.g., job satisfaction and work-related flow) in green office buildings by creating positive workplace behaviors (i.e., green behaviors). We collected multisource data from 549 employees and 91 managers working in 17 organizations in green office buildings across Australia. We confirm the double mediation effects of Green HRM, green behaviors and organizational identification on the relationships between organizational readiness, job satisfaction and work-related flow. The paper makes theoretical contributions by advancing the concept of Green HRM and green behaviors within the realm of SIT, thus taking a multidisciplinary stance in the built environment and sustainability literatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available