4.5 Article

Budget-Feasible Online Incentive Mechanisms for Crowdsourcing Tasks Truthfully

Journal

IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 647-661

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2014.2379281

Keywords

Crowdsourcing; incentive mechanism design; mobile crowd sensing; online auction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61332005, 61133015, 61228202, 61272426]
  2. Funds for Creative Research Groups of China [61421061]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120005130002]
  4. Beijing Committee of Education
  5. NSF [CNS-1035894, ECCS-1247944, CMMI 1436786]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mobile crowd sensing (MCS) is a new paradigm that takes advantage of pervasive mobile devices to efficiently collect data, enabling numerous novel applications. To achieve good service quality for an MCS application, incentive mechanisms are necessary to attract more user participation. Most existing mechanisms apply only for the offline scenario where all users report their strategic types in advance. On the contrary, we focus on a more realistic scenario where users arrive one by one online in a random order. Based on the online auction model, we investigate the problem that users submit their private types to the crowdsourcer when arriving, and the crowdsourcer aims at selecting a subset of users before a specified deadline for maximizing the value of services (assumed to be a nonnegative monotone submodular function) provided by selected users under a budget constraint. We design two online mechanisms, OMZ and OMG, satisfying the computational efficiency, individual rationality, budget feasibility, truthfulness, consumer sovereignty, and constant competitiveness under the zero arrival-departure interval case and a more general case, respectively. Through extensive simulations, we evaluate the performance and validate the theoretical properties of our online mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available