4.7 Article

Phonons of metallic hydrogen with quantum Monte Carlo

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0077749

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE [DE-SC0020177]
  2. Blue Waters Sustained-Petascale Computing Project
  3. National Science Foundation [OCI-0725070, ACI-1238993]
  4. state of Illinois
  5. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
  6. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  7. Illinois Campus Cluster Program (ICCP)
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020177] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work proposes a simple scheme to perform phonon calculations with quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods and applies it to metallic hydrogen. The conventional method of calculating force constants in metallic hydrogen is computationally expensive due to its energy and length scales, as well as statistical noise inherent in QMC methods. The authors demonstrate an alternate approach that is nearly 100 times more efficient in resolving the force constants required for calculating the phonon spectrum in the harmonic approximation, requiring only the calculation of atomic forces without significant programmatic modification.
We describe a simple scheme to perform phonon calculations with quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods and demonstrate it on metallic hydrogen. Because of the energy and length scales of metallic hydrogen and the statistical noise inherent to QMC methods, the conventional manner of calculating force constants is prohibitively expensive. We show that our alternate approach is nearly 100 times more efficient in resolving the force constants needed to calculate the phonon spectrum in the harmonic approximation. This requires only the calculation of atomic forces, as in the conventional approach, and otherwise little or no programmatic modification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available