4.7 Article

Cr2O3 layer inhibits agglomeration of phosphine-protected Au9 clusters on TiO2 films

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 155, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0059912

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Synchrotron, VIC, Australia [AS1/SXR/15819]
  2. U.S. Army Project [FA5209-16-R-0017]
  3. Australian Government, through the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) [(PPh3)8(NO3)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that deposition of phosphine-protected gold clusters on TiO2 films and covering them with a thin Cr2O3 film can effectively inhibit cluster agglomeration. This provides a new method for tailoring surface properties.
The properties of semiconductor surfaces can be modified by the deposition of metal clusters consisting of a few atoms. The properties of metal clusters and of cluster-modified surfaces depend on the number of atoms forming the clusters. Deposition of clusters with a monodisperse size distribution thus allows tailoring of the surface properties for technical applications. However, it is a challenge to retain the size of the clusters after their deposition due to the tendency of the clusters to agglomerate. The agglomeration can be inhibited by covering the metal cluster modified surface with a thin metal oxide overlayer. In the present work, phosphine-protected Au clusters, Au-9(PPh3)(8)(NO3)(3), were deposited onto RF-sputter deposited TiO2 films and subsequently covered with a Cr2O3 film only a few monolayers thick. The samples were then heated to 200 & DEG;C to remove the phosphine ligands, which is a lower temperature than that required to remove thiolate ligands from Au clusters. It was found that the Cr2O3 covering layer inhibited cluster agglomeration at an Au cluster coverage of 0.6% of a monolayer. When no protecting Cr2O3 layer was present, the clusters were found to agglomerate to a large degree on the TiO2 surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available