4.7 Article

Screening for Inhibitors of Main Protease in SARS-CoV-2: In Silico and In Vitro Approach Avoiding Peptidyl Secondary Amides

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 350-358

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01087

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)) from AMED [JP20am0101112]
  2. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [20H00620]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H00620] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In addition to vaccines, antiviral drugs are crucial for suppressing COVID-19. Through structure-based virtual screening and in vitro assays, compounds with new chemical structures and good oral absorption have been identified as potential candidates for future drug optimization.
In addition to vaccines, antiviral drugs are essential for suppressing COVID-19. Although several inhibitor candidates were reported for SARS-CoV-2 main protease, most are highly polar peptidomimetics with poor oral bioavailability and cell membrane permeability. Here, we conducted structure-based virtual screening and in vitro assays to obtain hit compounds belonging to a new chemical space, excluding peptidyl secondary amides. In total, 180 compounds were subjected to the primary assay at 20 mu M, and nine compounds with inhibition rates of >5% were obtained. The IC50 of six compounds was determined in dose-response experiments, with the values on the order of 10(-4) M. Although nitro groups were enriched in the substructure of the hit compounds, they did not significantly contribute to the binding interaction in the predicted docking poses. Physicochemical properties prediction showed good oral absorption. These new scaffolds are promising candidates for future optimization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available