4.2 Article

Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium Experiment for Butanone and Ethyl Acetate at 101.3 kPa

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 151-158

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.1c00690

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22008004]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZY2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the application of two ionic liquids and ethylene glycol in separating butanone and ethyl acetate, showing that the ionic liquids exhibited better separation ability. The NRTL model was found to accurately describe the influence of these entrainers on the phase equilibrium behavior, with a low average relative deviation of 0.033.
The formation of azeotrope brings severe challenges to the separation of butanone and ethyl acetate, two important chemical raw materials. In this article, two ionic liquids, 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis[(trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl] {[HMIM][NTf2]} and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis[(trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl] {[EMIM][NTf2]}, and ethylene glycol (EG) were selected as entrainers to separate butanone and ethyl acetate. Vapor-liquid equilibrium data of butanone-ethyl acetate-[EMIM][NTf2], butanone-ethyl acetate-[HMIM][NTf2], and butanone-ethyl acetate-EG were measured at atmospheric pressure. The results show that the three extractants can effectively break the azeotrope of butanone-ethyl acetate, and the significant salt effect makes [EMIM][NTf2] and [HMIM][NTf2] show better separation ability than EG. Then, a non-random two liquid (NRTL) thermodynamic model was further used to fit the experimental data, and the average relative deviation was only 0.033, indicating that the NRTL model can well describe the influence of these three entrainers on the phase equilibrium behavior of butanone-ethyl acetate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available