4.6 Article

Genome-wide association study of brain arteriolosclerosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 1437-1450

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X211066299

Keywords

VCID; SVD; arteriosclerosis; neuropathology; dementia; aging

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging Alzheimer's Disease Data Storage Site (NIAGADS) at the University of Pennsylvania [U24AG041689-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified putative loci associated with the risk of brain arteriolosclerosis (B-ASC) through a genome-wide association study. The findings provide clues for further understanding the genetic mechanism of B-ASC.
Brain arteriolosclerosis (B-ASC) is characterized by pathologically altered brain parenchymal arterioles. B-ASC is associated with cognitive impairment and increased likelihood of clinical dementia. To date, no study has been conducted on genome-wide genetic risk of autopsy-proven B-ASC. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the B-ASC phenotype using multiple independent aged neuropathologic cohorts. Included in the study were participants with B-ASC autopsy and genotype data available from the NACC, ROSMAP, ADNI, and ACT data sets. Initial Stage 1 GWAS (n = 3382) and Stage 2 mega-analysis (n = 4569) were performed using data from the two largest cohorts (NACC and ROSMAP). Replication of top variants and additional Stage 3 mega-analysis were performed incorporating two smaller cohorts (ADNI and ACT). Lead variants in the top two loci in the Stage 2 mega-analysis (rs7902929, p = 1.8 x 10(-7) ; rs2603462, p = 4 x 10(-7) ) were significant in the ADNI cohort (rs7902929, p = 0.012 ; rs2603462, p = 0.012 ). The rs2603462 lead variant colocalized with ELOVL4 expression in the cerebellum (posterior probability = 90.1%). Suggestive associations were also found near SORCS1 and SORCS3. We thus identified putative loci associated with B-ASC risk, but additional replication is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available