4.2 Article

General Anesthesia Leads to Underestimation of Regurgitation Severity in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 974-982

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.10.024

Keywords

mitral valve regurgitation; general anesthesia; three-dimensional echocardiography; transcatheter mitral valve repair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

General anesthesia underestimates the severity of mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair with secondary MR, but has less impact on primary MR.
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of general anesthesia (GA) on severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Participants: Fifty consecutive patients with symptomatic severe MR and extremely high surgical risk. Intervention: TMVR under GA. Measurements and Results: Transesophageal echocardiography was performed during the preprocedural workup under conscious sedation and during TMVR under GA. After the parameters of MR were assessed, color-flow jet area (CJA), vena contracta (VC), effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RVOL), three-dimensional (3D) vena contracta area (VCA), and severity of MR were compared between the two examinations. In patients with primary MR (n = 11), there were no significant differences in CJA, VC, EROA, RVOL, or 3D-VCA between pre- and intra-procedural transesophageal echocardiography. In patients with secondary MR (n = 39), GA led to significant decreases of CJA (10 +/- 7 v 7 +/- 3 cm(2), p < 0.001), VC (5.5 +/- 1.6 v 4.7 +/- 1.5 mm, p = 0.002), EROA (30 +/- 11 v 24 +/- 10 mm(2), p < 0.001), and RVOL (47 +/- 17 v 34 +/- 13 mL/beat, p < 0.001). Consequently, GA led to a downgrade of regurgitation severity classification in 44% of patients when assessed by two-dimensional analysis. When evaluated by 3D analysis, GA also led to a significant but less extensive decrease of MR (3D-VCA: 66 +/- 27 v 60 +/- 29 mm(2), p = 0.002), and subsequent downgrade of MR classification in 20% of patients. Conclusions: GA underestimates regurgitation severity in patients with secondary, but not primary MR, undergoing TMVR. This effect must be considered when evaluating the immediate result of the procedure. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available