4.6 Article

In vivo sensing of cutaneous edema: A comparative study of diffuse reflectance, Raman spectroscopy and multispectral imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202100268

Keywords

cutaneous edema; diffuse reflectance spectroscopy; multispectral imaging; Raman spectroscopy; water in the skin

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2020-926]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative assessment of water content in tissues is vital for biomedicine. Different optical spectroscopy methods were compared for characterizing cutaneous edema, showing promising results for introducing quantitative optical water measurement technology to clinical settings.
Quantitative noninvasive assessment of water content in tissues is important for biomedicine. Optical spectroscopy is potentially capable of solving this problem; however, its applicability for clinical diagnostics remains questionable. The presented study compares diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and multispectral imaging in the characterization of cutaneous edema. The source-detector geometries for each method are selected based on Monte Carlo simulations results to detect the signal from the dermis. Then, the kinetics of the edema development is studied for two models. All methods demonstrate synchronous trends for histamine-induced edema: The water content reaches a maximum of 1 hour after histamine application and then gradually decreases. For the venous occlusion, a 51% increase in water content is observed with Raman spectroscopy. The differences in water content estimation by three methods are explained based on the light propagation model. The obtained results are essential for introducing quantitative optical water measurement technology to the clinics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available