4.3 Article

Quantifying ADHD Symptoms in Open-Ended Everyday Life Contexts With a New Virtual Reality Task

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 1394-1411

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10870547211044214

Keywords

ADHD; executive function; naturalistic behavior; real-world attention; virtual reality

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [325981, 328954, 323251]
  2. Finnish Cultural Foundation [00190963, 00201002]
  3. Arvo and Lea Ylppo Foundation [202010005]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [323251, 328954, 325981, 323251, 328954, 325981] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that the EPELI task demonstrated predictive, discriminant, and concurrent validity in quantifying goal-directed behavior and ADHD symptoms, thus providing evidence for its ecological validity in assessing ADHD symptoms using virtual reality technology.
Objective: To quantify goal-directed behavior and ADHD symptoms in naturalistic conditions, we developed a virtual reality task, EPELI (Executive Performance in Everyday LIving), and tested its predictive, discriminant and concurrent validity. Method: We collected EPELI data, conventional neuropsychological task data, and parent-ratings of executive problems and symptoms in 38 ADHD children and 38 typically developing controls. Results: EPELI showed predictive validity as the ADHD group exhibited higher percentage of irrelevant actions reflecting lower attentional-executive efficacy and more controller movements and total game actions, both indicative of hyperactivity-impulsivity. Further, the five combined EPELI measures showed excellent discriminant validity (area under curve 88 %), while the correlations of the EPELI efficacy measure with parent-rated executive problems (r = .57) and ADHD symptoms (r = .55) pointed to its concurrent validity. Conclusion: We provide a proof-of-concept validation for a new virtual reality tool for ecologically valid assessment of ADHD symptoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available