4.4 Review

The effect of extended cryo-storage following vitrification on embryo competence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 873-882

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02405-3

Keywords

Cryo-storage; Vitrification; Cryo-survival; Live birth rate; Embryo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of prolonged cryo-storage on embryo competence and perinatal outcomes. The results indicate that cryo-storage duration beyond 12 months does not significantly affect survival rate, miscarriage, live birth, and major malformation rates.
Purpose Few studies explored whether prolonged cryo-storage after vitrification affects embryo competence and perinatal outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at highlighting any putative impact of cryo-storage duration on cryo-survival, miscarriage, live birth and major malformations. Methods A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Embase databases up to June 2021. Data were combined to obtain a pooled OR, and meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Out of 1,389 screened abstracts, 22 papers were assessed for eligibility, and 5 studies were included (N = 18,047 embryos). Prolonged cryo-storage was defined as > 12 months (N = 3389 embryos). Subgroup analysis was performed for untested vitrified cleavage stage embryos (N = 1739 embryos) and for untested and euploid vitrified blastocysts (N = 13,596 and 2712 embryos, respectively). Results Survival rate, miscarriage, live birth and major malformation rates were all similar in the two groups. Conclusion These data further support the safety of long-term cryo-storage of human embryos beyond 12 months. This is reassuring for good prognosis patients with surplus embryos, couples seeking a second child from supernumerary embryos and women postponing the transfer for clinical or personal reasons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available