4.6 Article

Multistage ore-forming processes and metal source recorded in texture and composition of pyrite from the Late Triassic Asiha gold deposit, Eastern Kunlun Orogenic Belt, western China

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104920

Keywords

Pyrite; Trace element; Sulfur isotope; Monazite U-Pb geochronology; Asiha gold deposit; Eastern Kunlun metallogenic belt

Funding

  1. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) [2019QZKK0801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Asiha vein-type gold deposit in the Eastern Kunlun Orogenic Belt provides a great opportunity for studying the sources of metals and origins of orogenic intrusion-related gold systems. Different types of pyrite in the deposit indicate three stages of hydrothermal mineralization, and the variation in metal content suggests the ore-forming materials were primarily derived from felsic magma mixed with different proportions of mafic-volcanic host rocks.
The Asiha vein-type gold deposit, located in the Eastern Kunlun Orogenic Belt, provides an excellent opportunity for deciphering sources of metals and origins of orogenic intrusion-related gold systems. Within this deposit, four types of pyrite have been distinguished in three stages of hydrothermal activities. Pyrite (Py1) occurs in quartz-pyrite veins (stage I); pyrite (Py2), consisting of core (Py2a) and rim (Py2b), occurs in quartz-polymetallic sulfide veins (stage II); pyrite (Py3) occurs in quartz-pyrite-chalcopyrite veins (stage III). Py1 contains high concentrations of As (median of 2090 ppm) and Au (0.1 ppm). Py2a is enriched in Co (43.1 ppm) and Ni (50.9 ppm), but depleted in As and Au. By contrast, Py2b is enriched in As (7894 ppm) and Au (0.5 ppm), but depleted in Co and Ni. Although, Py3 shows enrichment in Co (1319 ppm) and Ni (1783 ppm), it is usually accompanied with chalcopyrite and visible gold. Three generations of gold-associated pyrite indicate three stages of hydrothermal mineralization, and the variation of metals in pyrite suggest that the ore-forming materials were predominantly derived from felsic magma mixed with different proportion of mafic-volcanic host rocks. U-Pb dating on hydrothermal monazite from stage III constrains the mineralization age at 227 +/- 7 Ma, which is coeval with the concealed granite porphyry (228 Ma). The delta S-34 values of the pyrites vary from +4.8 parts per thousand to +8.9 parts per thousand, which are slightly higher than magmatic pyrite in porphyry (+4.2 parts per thousand to +5.6 parts per thousand). We tentatively propose that the ore-forming materials are closely related to the granite porphyry and the evolved magmatic hydrothermal fluids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available