Journal
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 795-801Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.12.035
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty; robotic surgery; accuracy; alignment; conventional instrumentation
Categories
Funding
- DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction, a Johnson & Johnson Company
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study demonstrates that image-free robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy compared to conventional instrumentation and reduce the incidence of outliers.
Background: Improving resection accuracy and eliminating outliers in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important to improving patient outcomes regardless of alignment philosophy. Robotic-assisted surgical systems improve resection accuracy and reproducibility compared to conventional instrumentation. Some systems require preoperative imaging while others rely on intraoperative anatomic landmarks. We hypothesized that the alignment accuracy of a novel image-free robotic-assisted surgical system would be equivalent or better than conventional instrumentation with fewer outliers. Methods: Forty cadaveric specimens were used in this study. Five orthopedic surgeons performed 8 bilateral TKAs each, using the VELYS Robotic-Assisted System (DePuy Synthes) and conventional instrumentation on contralateral knees. Pre-resection and postresection computed tomography scans, along with optical scans of the implant positions were performed to quantify resection accuracies relative to the alignment targets recorded intraoperatively. Results: The robotic-assisted cohort demonstrated smaller resection errors compared to conventional instrumentation in femoral coronal alignment (0.63 degrees +/- 0.50 degrees vs 1.39 degrees +/- 0.95 degrees, P < .001), femoral sagittal alignment (1.21 degrees +/- 0.90 degrees vs 3.27 degrees +/- 2.51 degrees, P < .001), and tibial coronal alignment (0.93 degrees +/- 0.72 degrees vs 1.65 degrees +/- 1.29 degrees, P = .001). All other resection angle accuracies were equivalent. Similar improvements were found in the femoral implant coronal alignment (0.89 degrees +/- 0.82 degrees vs 1.42 degrees +/- 1.15 degrees, P = .011), femoral implant sagittal alignment (1.51 degrees +/- 1.08 degrees vs 2.49 degrees +/- 2.10 degrees, P = .006), and tibial implant coronal alignment (1.31 degrees +/- 0.84 degrees vs 2.03 degrees +/- 1.44 degrees, P = .004). The robotic-assisted cohort had fewer outliers (errors >3 degrees) for all angular resection alignments. Conclusion: This in vitro study demonstrated that image-free robotic-assisted TKA can improve alignment accuracy compared to conventional instrumentation and reduce the incidence of outliers. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available