4.5 Article

Foliar water uptake of four shrub species in a semi-arid desert

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104629

Keywords

Dew; Desert; Water potential; Foliar water uptake; Water-use strategy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [31700638]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that four dominant shrub species in the Mu Us Desert of northern China have the ability to absorb dew water through their leaves, increasing their water potential and potentially enhancing their survival in arid environments.
Dew water plays an important role in supporting biological processes in desert ecosystems. Although some mechanisms underlying how plants survive in water-limited environments have been investigated, the water-use strategies of most desert plants remain unclear. We investigated whether foliar uptake of dew water occurs in four dominant shrub species (Artemisia ordosica, Hedysarum mongolicum, Salix psammophila, and Caragana korshinskii), in the Mu Us Desert of northern China. A fluorescent tracing experiment indicated that all four species absorbed water via leaf trichomes and cuticles, and A. ordosica also absorbed water via the stomata. A dew water exposure experiment and isotopic tracing revealed that water entered the leaves and stems of the four species, thereby enhancing their water potential. The relative contribution of dew water to the total water in the leaves of A. ordosica, H. mongolicum, S. psammophila, and C. korshinskii was 20.0 +/- 7.0%, 8.4 +/- 6.4%, 7.8 +/- 1.9%, 3.1 +/- 2.3%, respectively. The results demonstrated that all four species had the capacity to absorb water by their leaves, and the absorbed water could be transported to the stems. Our findings suggest that foliar water uptake may be one of the survival mechanisms by shrubs in the desert environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available