4.5 Article

Proprioception: a new look at an old concept

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages 811-814

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00809.2021

Keywords

kinesthesia; proprioception

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1195699]
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1195699] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a novel framework for human proprioception assessment, which includes low-level and high-level proprioceptive judgments. Low-level judgments are made within a single reference frame, while high-level judgments are made in a different reference frame.
Proprioception, which can be defined as the awareness of the mechanical and spatial state of the body and its musculoskeletal parts, is critical to motor actions and contributes to our sense of body ownership. To date, clinical proprioceptive tests have focused on a person's ability to detect, discriminate, or match limb positions or movements, and reveal that the strength of the relationship between deficits in proprioception and physical function varies widely. Unfortunately, these tests fail to assess higher-level proprioceptive abilities. In this Perspective, we propose that to understand fully the link between proprioception and function, we need to look beyond traditional clinical tests of proprioception. Specifically, we present a novel framework for human proprioception assessment that is divided into two categories: low-level and high-level proprioceptive judgments. Lowlevel judgments are those made in a single frame of reference and are the types of judgments made in traditional proprioceptive tests (i.e., detect, discriminate or match). High-level proprioceptive abilities involve proprioceptive judgments made in a different frame of reference. For example, when a person indicates where their hand is located in space. This framework acknowledges that proprioception is complex and multifaceted and that tests of proprioception should not be viewed as interchangeable, but rather as complimentary. Crucially, it provides structure to the way researchers and clinicians can approach proprioception and its assessment. We hope this Perspective serves as the catalyst for discussion and new lines of investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available