4.6 Article

Trapping positions in a dual-beam optical trap

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 130, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0068183

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates trapping positions of weakly absorbing, spherical particles in a dual-beam optical trap, identifying four distinct trapping behavior regimes. The impact of beam offsetting and power imbalance between the two beams is evaluated, providing key insights into the workings of dual-beam optical traps. Experimental results demonstrate the possibility of fitting the evolution of particle trapping position to determine the particle's relative position to the focal point of each beam.
Optical trapping has become an important tool in a wide range of fields. While these traps are most commonly realized using optical tweezers, dual-beam optical traps offer specific advantages for certain experiments. It is commonly assumed that a particle will become trapped midway between the focal points of the two beams. However, this is not always the case. We perform a theoretical and experimental investigation of trapping positions of weakly absorbing, spherical particles in a dual-beam optical trap. We evaluate the effect of offsetting the beams in the direction of propagation and identify four regimes with distinct trapping behavior. The effect of an offset perpendicular to the propagation direction and an imbalance in power between the two beams is also considered. Experiments utilize an aqueous aerosol particle whose size can be readily controlled and monitored over hundreds of nanometers. As such, it serves as an excellent probe of the optical trap. We demonstrate that it is possible to fit the evolution of the particle trapping position in order to determine the position of the particle relative to the focal point of each beam. The results presented here provide key insights into the workings of dual-beam optical traps, elucidating more complex behaviors than previously known.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available