4.7 Article

Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 8, Pages 1967-1975

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14060

Keywords

afforestation; decolonisation; open ecosystems; public perception; reforestation; research bias; savannas; tree planting

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  3. CNPq [309709/2020-2, 303988/2018-5, 312270/2017-8]
  4. CAPES
  5. NERC-FAPESP [2019/07773-1, NE/S000011/1]
  6. USDA-NIFA Sustainable Agricultural Systems [2019-68012-29819]
  7. USDA-NIFA McIntire-Stennis Project [1016880]
  8. National Science Foundation [DEB-1931232]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified disparities in attention, action, and knowledge among different biomes in tropical restoration science, practice, and policy, with forests receiving more focus than open biomes. The findings suggest a need to increase awareness and recognition of the value of open biomes for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, climate change mitigation, and human livelihoods, in order to effectively achieve the goals of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
We introduce the concept of Biome Awareness Disparity (BAD)-defined as a failure to appreciate the significance of all biomes in conservation and restoration policy-and quantify disparities in (a) attention and interest, (b) action and (c) knowledge among biomes in tropical restoration science, practice and policy. By analysing 50,000 tweets from all Partner Institutions of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration, and 45,000 tweets from the main science and environmental news media world-wide, we found strong disparities in attention and interest relative to biome extent and diversity. Tweets largely focused on forests, whereas open biomes (such as grasslands, savannas and shrublands) received less attention in relation to their area. In contrast to these differences in attention, there were equivalent likes and retweets between forest versus open biomes, suggesting the disparities may not reflect the views of the general public. Through a literature review, we found that restoration experiments are disproportionately concentrated in rainforests, dry forests and mangroves. More than half of the studies conducted in open biomes reported tree planting as the main restoration action, suggesting inappropriate application of forest-oriented techniques. Policy implications. We urge scientists, policymakers and land managers to recognise the value of open biomes for protecting biodiversity, securing ecosystem services, mitigating climate change and enhancing human livelihoods. Fixing Biome Awareness Disparity will increase the likelihood of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration successfully delivering its promises.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available