4.7 Article

A Decentralized Bayesian Algorithm For Distributed Compressive Sensing in Networked Sensing Systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 1282-1292

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2015.2487989

Keywords

Distributed compressive sensing (DCS); Bayesian inference; signal reconstruction

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/K033700/1]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [61401018, U1334202]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014JBM149]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety of Beijing Jiaotong University [RCS2014ZT08]
  5. Chinese Ministry of Education [313006]
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K033700/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/K033700/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compressive sensing (CS), as a new sensing/sampling paradigm, facilitates signal acquisition by reducing the number of samples required for reconstruction of the original signal, and thus appears to be a promising technique for applications where the sampling cost is high, e.g., the Nyquist rate exceeds the current capabilities of analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). Conventional CS, although effective for dealing with one signal, only leverages the intrasignal correlation for reconstruction. This paper develops a decentralized Bayesian reconstruction algorithm for networked sensing systems to jointly reconstruct multiple signals based on the distributed compressive sensing (DCS) model that exploits both intra-and intersignal correlations. The proposed approach is able to address-networked sensing system applications with privacy concerns and/or for a fusion-center-free scenario, where centralized approaches fail. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed decentralized approaches have good recovery performance and converge reasonably quickly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available