4.5 Article

Economic values of reproductive, growth, feed efficiency and carcass traits in Nellore cattle

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages 170-180

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12652

Keywords

bioeconomic model; economic value; feed efficiency; Nellore cattle; performance traits; seedstock operation

Funding

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A bioeconomic model was developed to calculate the economic value of reproductive and growth performance, feed efficiency, and carcass traits in a seedstock Nellore herd. The study found that preweaning average daily gain had the most significant economic impact on profits.
A bioeconomic model was developed to calculate the economic value (ev) of reproductive and growth performance, feed efficiency and carcass traits of a seedstock Nellore herd. Data from a full-cycle cattle operation (1,436 dams) located in the Brazilian Cerrado were assessed. The ev was calculated by the difference in profit before and after one-unit improvement in the trait, with others remaining unchanged. The ev was standardized by the phenotypic standard deviation of each trait. Preweaning average daily gain (ADG) was the most economically important trait evaluated (R$ 58.04/animal/year), followed by age at first calving (R$ 44.35), postweaning ADG (R$ 31.43), weight at 450 days (R$ 25.36), accumulated productivity (R$ 21.43), ribeye area (R$ 21.35), calving interval (R$ 19.97), feed efficiency (R$ 15.24), carcass dressing per cent (R$ 8.27), weight at 120 days (R$ 6.22), weight at 365 days (R$ 6.06), weight at weaning (210 days, R$ 5.82), stayability (R$ 5.70) and the probability of early calving (R$ 0.32). The effects of all traits on profits are evidence that their selection may result in the economic and genetic progress of the herd if there is genetic variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available